The Legislature enacted Senate Bill (hereinafter SB) 178, which was signed into law by Governor Brown on October 8, 2015, and became effective on January 1, 2016. This is perhaps the biggest legislative change in California privacy laws, in the area of criminal law, to happen in the last few years, and certainly in the 2015-2016 legislative session. This is a reference guide designed to break down SB 178.
In 2015, the Legislature enacted several Penal Code sections related to electronic communication and privacy issues. Those laws became effective as of January 1, 2016. Assembly Bill 929 deals with pen register and trap and trace search warrants. This is a reference guide designed to break down AB 929.
To access the complete Reference Guide on Assembly Bill 929, click here.
Law enforcement is at an inflection point in its relationship with the public. Along with the traditional yardstick that assesses an agency’s effectiveness in reducing crime rates, law enforcement agencies have to gauge their success in community relations. In response, agencies nationwide have adopted the use of Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) as a means to maintain public trust, enhance criminal cases, reduce liability and discourage misconduct.
Investigating cases involving Snapchat can be difficult. The application is designed to destroy the very evidence law enforcement officers need to investigate and prove a criminal case. But are the images actually gone? Is it possible to retrieve them? Even if they are gone, are there other types and sources of information that can be used in a criminal investigation? Before answering those questions it is helpful to understand the language and services of Snapchat.
Social media is a powerful and prolific communication medium among the public, replacing traditional forms like television and print. The Department’s desire to communicate with the public is part of the charter of Law Enforcement. Therefore, utilizing technology (i.e., Social Media) is critical for the Department to maintain effective communication with the public. To be effective, Social Media requires collective participation. Management by the Public Affairs Office or by a PIO is insufficient and ineffective.