Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)
Evaluations For: PIO and Community Engagement
Instructor: Doug Nolte
Location: Dearborn, MI
Dates: August 21, 2017 - August 22, 2017
Follow Up Questions
100% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.
100% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.
100% will be able to use what they learned in this course.
Individual Evaluations
Evaluation 1
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Great job as always.
Evaluation 2
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Thank you for taking the time to bring this quality class to the Metro Detroit Area
Evaluation 3
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
-
Evaluation 4
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Interesting course. Only suggestion would be to incorporate more videos into the course. Maybe some videos of comparassions. This would help break up the lecture.
Evaluation 5
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Power point font was too small.
Topics should be separate classes.
The instructor was well versed in subject matter, friendly, and professional.
Evaluation 6
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
I enjoyed the more thought provoking cerebral approach to the subject matter. It was the right mix of class participation and instruction. Not a straight lecture and repetitive exercises that do little to inspire thought.