Evaluations

/Evaluations
Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)

Evaluations For: Analytics for Public Safety

Instructor: Kelly Hooper
Location: Richfield, OH
Dates: July 30, 2015 - July 31, 2015

Follow Up Questions

88% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.

88% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.

100% will be able to use what they learned in this course.

Individual Evaluations

Previous
Next

Evaluation 1

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
none

Evaluation 2

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
good class

Evaluation 3

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Good interactive training.

Evaluation 4

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)2
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)2
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)3
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?no
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?no
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
It was a little basic to really be a valuable course. Each slide was only reviewed for a minute or two. It felt like a quick overview of an intelligence analyst's job which all analysts already know. Also, the class was supposed to go until 4 pm each day; however, we were let out at 2pm the first day and 12pm the second day. I thought we could have used this time to learn more/go in depth about certain topics.

Evaluation 5

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
N/A

Evaluation 6

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)4
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
handouts need to be up to date.

Evaluation 7

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Kelly was awesome!! I pretty sure I was no where near the skill level as others in the class and Kelly made sure that I understood and helped me make my first ever briefing screen using power points!!

Evaluation 8

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Well organized and presented class.