Evaluations

/Evaluations
Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)

Evaluations For: Analytics for Public Safety

Instructor: Sally Rawlings
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Dates: September 9, 2015 - September 10, 2015

Follow Up Questions

100% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.

100% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.

100% will be able to use what they learned in this course.

Individual Evaluations

Previous
Next

Evaluation 1

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None

Evaluation 2

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Sally was a great Instructor and loved her interaction with the class!

Evaluation 3

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Sally Kept the course content relative to current events and presented material in a concise manner

Evaluation 4

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)4
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
n/a

Evaluation 5

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)3
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)3
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Overall good. The presenter was knowledgeable and skillful. I know it is hard to pack a lot into a two-day course, but I would like to have spent more time on building substantive technical skills on maps and timelines. Perhaps including smaller workshops into the two-day course to test techniques as we go would be more effective than one large presentation at the end. Thanks!

Evaluation 6

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Good class, especially enjoyed learning how to conduct a presentation in the intel community.