Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1277)PowerPoint for Public Safety (738)Cell Phone Investigations (700)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (492)Online Investigations (469)Open Source Investigations (467)Analytics for Public Safety (397)Social Media Methods (295)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (277)PIO and Community Engagement (182)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (140)OIS Investigations (135)OneNote: Digital Case Management (115)Securing Your Identity (92)Analytic Unit Supervisor (84)Find Anyone Online (68)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Human Trafficking Investigations (46)Operational Red Flags (42)Excel: Data and Mapping (37)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (30)Confidential Informants (29)Social Media Investigations (23)Fentanyl Investigations (14)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Excel: Advanced Topics (11)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)
Evaluations For: Cell Phone Investigations
Instructor: Ashley Englefield
Location: Sacramento, CA
Dates: October 7, 2019 - October 8, 2019
Follow Up Questions
60% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.
60% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.
60% will be able to use what they learned in this course.
Individual Evaluations
Evaluation 1
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
This course was exactly the same material as the first course he taught (Cell Phone Investigations). Same slideshows.
Evaluation 2
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
The class was geared more towards law enforcement, not the defense.
Evaluation 3
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
cons: There was not enough hands on exercises, too much powerpoint, average class interaction (maybe because of small class size)
pros: Instructor knew subject matter well, provided good case studies,
Evaluation 4
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
I have taken a lot of investigative courses over the past year. This was by far the best in terms of tools I can begin using immediately in my investigations. The instructor was fantastic as well.
Evaluation 5
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Great glass. Learned a lot. Should be a three day class!