Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)
Evaluations For: Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement
Instructor: Kenneth Aycock
Location: Washington, DC
Dates: July 26, 2018 - July 26, 2018
Follow Up Questions
50% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.
70% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.
60% will be able to use what they learned in this course.
Individual Evaluations
Evaluation 1
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 2
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Information on slides didn't match up with content in work book. Workbook was put together not as well as other Police Technical workbooks.
Instructor seemed more focused on getting out to catch a flight than teach material thoroughly. Understandable the Friday timeline, but the flight should've been booked for a little later than 5pm to facilitate enough time to complete the training and get to the airport on time.
Evaluation 3
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
The instructor was VERY nice. The course appeared to be designed for students with less experience than those in this course.
Evaluation 4
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Felt as if the instructor did not challenge us in this course
Evaluation 5
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
The instructor's political comments and personal views were unwelcome and made me uncomfortable.
Evaluation 6
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 7
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
This course was painful to sit through and of little value.
Evaluation 8
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
This curriculum was awful.
Evaluation 9
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Instruction was great
Evaluation 10
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
None