Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)
Evaluations For: Analytics for Public Safety
Instructor: Kenneth Aycock
Location: Buffalo Grove, IL
Dates: May 7, 2018 - May 8, 2018
Follow Up Questions
90% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.
90% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.
90% will be able to use what they learned in this course.
Individual Evaluations
Evaluation 1
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 2
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 3
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 4
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
None
Evaluation 5
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
I really enjoyed the hands on experience with the case that was provided to us in the class.
The video clips were really hard to hear due to the sound quality in the room.
Evaluation 6
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Ken Aycock is a great guy, personable, very knowledgeable and well credentialed. As an instructor he needs some seasoning. He read verbatim the PP slides he chose to stop and share with the class. The PP slides were all too long, contained far too much verbiage and not enough charts, diagrams and examples. The course book was similar in construction and contains far too much run-on text, and is not well formatted. It needs more section and sub-section delimiters, bullet points and formatting for readability and usability.
Our six page practice exercise was too long and rife with errors, creating a slow down in applying the constructs we were trying to learn. Suspects names were interchanged, as were wives and children. It added issues to the process of learning that could have been negated by the instructor proof reading his materials first.
I enjoyed Ken as a person and law enforcement professional, but found his training methods and delivery somewhat unorganized.
Evaluation 7
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
It was interesting do something so quickly, whereas, we normally have a couple of weeks to complete and rehearse so one hand knows what the other one will do in the presentation.
Great course !!
And yes, I would recommend it to others.
Evaluation 8
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
N/A
Evaluation 9
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Evaluation 10
Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)
Quality of the Training Location
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)
Credibility (Education, Experience)
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?
Excellent exercise.