Evaluations

/Evaluations
Courses
Excel for Public Safety (1318)PowerPoint for Public Safety (756)Cell Phone Investigations (711)Cell Phone Data and Mapping (555)Dark Web Investigations (499)Open Source Investigations (473)Online Investigations (469)Analytics for Public Safety (404)Social Media Methods (298)Effective Writing for Law Enforcement (287)PIO and Community Engagement (199)Exploiting Technology in Real Time Investigations (162)OneNote: Digital Case Management (152)Critical Thinking for Law Enforcement (141)OIS Investigations (140)Analytic Unit Supervisor (114)Securing Your Identity (98)Find Anyone Online (77)Cryptocurrency Investigations (60)Passenger Vehicle Drug Interdiction (52)Human Trafficking Investigations (49)Excel: Data and Mapping (47)Operational Red Flags (42)Internet of Things (IoT) Investigations (37)Confidential Informants (32)Social Media Investigations (31)Excel: Advanced Topics (21)Fentanyl Investigations (16)Narcotics Investigations (14)Patrol Officer Response to Street Drugs (13)Real Time Crime Centers (RTCC) for Public Safety (13)Dialogue on Race and Law Enforcement (7)Undercover Chatting and Personas (5)Drug Identification (4)Slavery's Legacy for Law Enforcement (4)Interview Techniques (3)

Evaluations For: Cell Phone Investigations

Instructor: James Isaacs
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Dates: January 9, 2018 - January 10, 2018

Follow Up Questions

100% would recommend this course/instructor to others in their agency.

91% would recommend this training provider to others in their agency.

100% will be able to use what they learned in this course.

Individual Evaluations

Previous
Next

Evaluation 1

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)4
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location3
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)4
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)4
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Excellent course and excellent instructor.

Evaluation 2

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)3
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)4
Credibility (Education, Experience)4
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)4
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)4
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None

Evaluation 3

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Good information

Evaluation 4

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location4
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
I found the Instructor, James Issacs to be very knowledgeable, and knew how to incorporate and present the course material into our investigations. I was able to assist another Detective using the material and points of contact learned from Mr. Issacs. V/R Tony Ramirez #553

Evaluation 5

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Fantastic course, fantastic instructor! Learned a great deal of information that I can use!

Evaluation 6

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None

Evaluation 7

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
10

Evaluation 8

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)3
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Good class

Evaluation 9

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
None

Evaluation 10

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)4
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)4
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?no
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Inconsistent time management forced students to have to take their own breaks and miss critical steps in excel procedures which were not well understood by some. Being forced to wait, create accounts and log in to obtain the training certificate is also not optimal.

Evaluation 11

Rating of the Program Quality
Quality of the Presentation Materials (PowerPoint, other Visual Aids)5
Quality of the Training Materials (Handouts, Manuals, Brochures)5
Quality of the Training Location5
Overall Value of the Course (Value = Cost vs. Benefit)5
Please Rate the Ability Of the Lead Instructor
Overall Presentation Style (Eye Contact, Voice, Poise)5
Credibility (Education, Experience)5
Command of Subject (Subject Knowledge)5
Enthusiasm for the Topic (Made you want to learn)5
Students Interaction (Called students by name, asked for questions)5
Final Comments
Would you recommend this course/instructor to others in your agency?yes
Would you recommend this training provider to others in your agency?yes
Will you be able to use what you learned in the course?yes
Great information was given in relation to investigating cases involving cellphones. Instructor was very knowledgeable and presented material in an easy to understand manner.